The tagline to this weblog is “a discourse on feminine essentialist science and metaphysics.” In reading the material covered so far, one may wonder why I have included “feminine” in the tagline. What is feminine about the material? How is feminine essentialism different than essentialism in general? Other readers may notice that there are many articles about tradition and that this weblog upholds tradition, as a general rule. Is not tradition patriarchal?
The answer to these questions is that historically, patriarchy itself was a revolt against the early feminine tradition. I am assuming that anyone who has followed this weblog so far should understand that patriarchy and the masculine does not refer to biological males, nor does feminine refer to biological females. Masculine and feminine are metaphysical principles in and of themselves, but they are not completely separate from biological gender. Indeed, biological gender does find its roots in the metaphysical, as does everything else on the material plane. On the other hand, just as everything on the material plane is an imperfect reflection of Perfect Form, so biological gender is an imperfect reflection of the higher principles.
The Primordial Tradition is indeed feminine. We can find all over the world images of Dea, or the Feminine God, in Her various forms. It was not until the Age of Iron that we see the Divine reflected in Masculine form. At first, the Feminine God obtained Masculine Consorts, and in the West, there was a violent revolution in which the Masculine overtook and attempted to obliterate the Feminine. The Masculine also took over in the East; however, the Divine Feminine survived in such traditions as the Japanese tradition and the Indian traditions. This Patriarchal Revolution took place all across the world around 600 to 500 B.C.
What was the world like prior to the Patriarchal Revolution? It is hard to know. Most of our historical, written records are from the Patriarchal period, and in the West, the Patriarchal Revolution was quite violent. The Judeo-Christian written tradition chronicles the stamping out of the worship of Asharah and the Queen of Heaven. Mundane archaeology has uncovered physical evidence to suggest that prior to around 500 B.C., Yahweh and Asharah were worshiped alongside each other as consorts. It seems that the Canaanite Baal was also a consort to Asharah. Interestingly enough traditions, such as Judaism, that can not be traced to a specific “founder” such as Jesus or Mohammed, tend to be the most fiercely Patriarchal. This makes a great deal of sense if one understands that there was a revolt against the Feminine Tradition, and the unfounded traditions were reacting in keeping with this revolt. Still one can see elements of the Primordial Feminine Tradition in Judaism, in such practices as the Mother of the House lighting the Shabbat candles and giving the Shabbat blessing.
The Masculine Principle on a metaphysical level is associated with Mars, or Sai Vikhë in the Filianist tradition. At its highest level, the Martial/Vikhelic Principle governs the Divine Conflict between Good and Evil, and is a protection against the Forces of Darkness. In its lower form, the Martial/Vikhelic Principle is associated with conflicts of all kinds. It is interesting that in cultures, such as Ancient Minos, which had a primarily Feminine spirituality, there does not appear to be evidence of weapons of war or a standing army. Ancient Minos seems to have been a rather gentle culture in comparison with many other Ancient cultures that we know of.
Were women the dominant gender prior to the Patriarchal Revolution? Perhaps, perhaps not. Again, we have few if any written records to refer to. It is likely that women governed, because in Traditional cultures, societies tended to conform with their spirituality. There is certainly no reason to presuppose that men were suppressed or oppressed during these times. It is much more likely to presuppose that relations between women and men were rather harmonious, and that without the predominance of the Martial/Vikhelic Principle, there was little in the way of cruelty or oppression in general.
Why did the Patriarchal Revolution happen? Again, there is no way to know the specifics from a fact based perspective. Likely, it happened gradually over time. As I discussed previously, in the natural Unfolding of the Ages. we are in the Age of Iron, which, aside from being the Age most consolidated in matter, is also the harshest and most violent Age. Iron is the metal of Mars/Sai Vikhë, so it stands to reason that the Age of Iron would be the most Martial/Vikhelic, and it would become more so as the Age progressed. It is possible that as the Age progressed, the Martial/Vikhelic nature of patriarchy seemed to offer better protection. It is likely that this was at least partially the impetus in the Hebrew tradition, with the pressure of the neighboring warlike states intent on conquest. The Roman period was a particularly Martial/Vikhelic period in the West, and many of our current customs and cultures derive from the Roman period. Indeed, Christianity, the dominant spiritual tradition of the West, has been transmitted to us through the Roman Empire.
As I stated earlier in this article, the Masculine and Feminine Principles are related to, but not synonymous with, biological males and females. As evidence of that, one can see in our current times that the Masculine Principle has all but completely overtaken the Feminine Principle, particularly in the West. Certainly, women have more “rights” than they ever had; however, these “rights” are bound up in the Masculine Principle. Femininity itself became more and more devalued as the Feminist Movement progressed. Lately, there seems to have been a resurgence of value given to the Feminine Principle; however, compared to sixty years ago, the Feminine Principle has been largely trampled.
One may ask what this has to do with a weblog devoted to philosophy, metaphysics, traditional science, and astrology? A lot more than one might think. To begin with, this weblog does not equate Tradition with patriarchy or the cruelties that have occurred during the Patriarchal Age. Quite the contrary. Patriarchy and the over-balanced Martial/Vikhelic influences that accompany it are seen as deviations from an earlier, gentle, and Feminine Tradition. Also, one may notice that I rarely, if ever, quote from Classical, Medieval, or Renaissance philosophers or astrologers in this weblog. I most certainly have studied many of these authors, and the astrology that I practice derives from the principles taught by these authors. On the other hand, almost all written material that is available to us is from after and is colored by the Patriarchal period. Also, there are many fine Classical Astrologers within the International Society of Classical Astrologers, who have done and are doing fine work in analyzing the methods used and philosophy taught by these authors, so that I do not think that my voice can really add to that discussion.
Part of the work of this weblog is to dig a bit deeper and retrieve the ideas and the principles from the older Feminine Tradition. Many of these principles did and do survive even to this day. Indeed, Classical Astrology is one of the few disciplines in the Modern West where these principles have been preserved, albeit in a masculinized and patriarchal form. Classical Astrology is also one of the few disciplines that still functions as a true traditional science to a large extent, in that metaphysical principles are studied and applied to solve practical problems in the material world.
I am attempting to do the work of digging deeper, and replanting traditional metaphysics and practical astrology in its earlier Feminine Essentialist roots. I am also making a humble attempt at working out how traditional Patriarchal metaphysics and Classical Astrology fit within the older Feminine Tradition. Luckily, I am blessed with the able and kind assistance and teaching of friends and mentors. Much of this weblog is devoted to that task; hence the tagline, “a discourse on feminine essentialist science and metaphysics.”